United States of America v. Neal et al

Filing 13

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION BETWEEN U.S.A. and HOEVET & BOISE, P.C. - (Granting the Stipulated Motion to Dismiss 12 defendatn Hoevet & Boise, P.C. with prejudice as a party-defendant; and both parties shall bear their own costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 28th day of April, 2011, by U.S. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)

Download PDF
Z8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Civil No. 11-353-AC Plaintiff, ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION BETWEEN UNITED STATES AND HOEVET & BOISE, P.C. v. TERRY L. NEAL; BADGER CREEK NURSERY, LLC; MICHAEL NEAL, individuallY, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Maureen Gail Neal, Deceased, and as Trustee of Neal Family Trust; SHANNON NEAL; STEVE MARTIN CONSTRUCTION, INC; HOEVET & BOISE, P.C.; NEAL FAMILY TRUST; and CLACKAMAS COUNTY Defendants. Pursuant to the Stipulation Re: Disclaimer ofInterest by Hoevet & Boise, P.C., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: (1) The Stipulation Re: Disclaimer ofInterest by Hoevet & Boise, P.C., is hereby approved; (2) Hoevet & Boise, P.C. has no interest in the property described in the stipulation and in paragraph 13 of the United States' complaint or in any proceeds from the sale ofthe propelty; (3) Defendant Hoevet & Boise, P .C. is DISMISSED with prejudice as a partydefendant; and ORDER Case No. 11-353-AC I (4) Both parties shall bear their own costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. /)~IA DATED {r/} / th~ day 0 44--,2011. UNITE Respectfully submitted by: DWIGHT C. HOLTON United States Attomey /s/ Ouinn P. Harrington JEREMYN. HENDON QUINN P. HARRINGTON Trial Attomeys, Tax Division U.S. Depmtment of Justice P.O. Box 683, Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044 Telephone: (202) 353-2466 (202) 514-6507 Facsimile: (202) 307-0054 Email: Jeremy.Hendon@usdoj.gov Ouinn.P .Harri 11 gtol1({llusdoj. go v Westem.Taxcivil@usdoi.gov ORDER Case No. 11-353-AC 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?