United States of America v. Neal et al
Filing
13
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION BETWEEN U.S.A. and HOEVET & BOISE, P.C. - (Granting the Stipulated Motion to Dismiss 12 defendatn Hoevet & Boise, P.C. with prejudice as a party-defendant; and both parties shall bear their own costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 28th day of April, 2011, by U.S. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
Z8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Civil No. 11-353-AC
Plaintiff,
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION
BETWEEN UNITED STATES AND
HOEVET & BOISE, P.C.
v.
TERRY L. NEAL; BADGER CREEK
NURSERY, LLC; MICHAEL NEAL,
individuallY, as Personal Representative of
the Estate of Maureen Gail Neal, Deceased,
and as Trustee of Neal Family Trust;
SHANNON NEAL; STEVE MARTIN
CONSTRUCTION, INC; HOEVET &
BOISE, P.C.; NEAL FAMILY TRUST; and
CLACKAMAS COUNTY
Defendants.
Pursuant to the Stipulation Re: Disclaimer ofInterest by Hoevet & Boise, P.C., IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED:
(1)
The Stipulation Re: Disclaimer ofInterest by Hoevet & Boise, P.C., is hereby
approved;
(2)
Hoevet & Boise, P.C. has no interest in the property described in the stipulation
and in paragraph 13 of the United States' complaint or in any proceeds from the
sale ofthe propelty;
(3)
Defendant Hoevet & Boise, P .C. is DISMISSED with prejudice as a partydefendant; and
ORDER
Case No. 11-353-AC
I
(4)
Both parties shall bear their own costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/)~IA
DATED
{r/} /
th~ day 0 44--,2011.
UNITE
Respectfully submitted by:
DWIGHT C. HOLTON
United States Attomey
/s/ Ouinn P. Harrington
JEREMYN. HENDON
QUINN P. HARRINGTON
Trial Attomeys, Tax Division
U.S. Depmtment of Justice
P.O. Box 683, Ben Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044
Telephone: (202) 353-2466
(202) 514-6507
Facsimile: (202) 307-0054
Email: Jeremy.Hendon@usdoj.gov
Ouinn.P .Harri 11 gtol1({llusdoj. go v
Westem.Taxcivil@usdoi.gov
ORDER
Case No. 11-353-AC
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?