United States of America v. Neal et al
Filing
24
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION BETWEEN UNITED STATES and BADGER CREEK NURSERY, LLC - (Grant Motion to Dismiss 19 . Defendant Badger Creek Nursery, LLC is DISMISSED with prejudice as a party-defendant; and both parties shall bear their own costs. Dated this 5th day of May, 2011, by U.S. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Civil No. 11-353-AC
Plaintiff,
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION
BETWEEN UNITED STATES AND
BADGER CREEK NURSERY, LLC
v.
TERRY L. NEAL; BADGER CREEK
NURSERY. LLC; MICHAEL NEAL.
individually. as Personal Representative of
the Estate of Maureen Gail Neal. Deceased,
and as Trustee of Neal Family Trust;
SHANNON NEAL; STEVE MARTIN
CONSTRUCTION. INC; HOEVET &
BOISE. P.C.; NEAL FAMILY TRUST; and
CLACKAMAS COUNTY
Defendants.
Pursuant to the Stipulation Re: Disclaimer of Interest by Badger Creek NursClY, LLC, IT
IS HEREBY ORDERED:
(1)
The Stipulation Re: Disclaimer of Interest by Badger Creek Nursely, LLC, is
hereby approved;
(2)
Badger Creek NurselY, LLC, has no interest in the property described in the
stipulation and in paragraph 13 of the United States' complaint or in any proceeds
from the sale of the property;
(3)
Defendant Badger Creek Nursery, LLC is DISMISSED with prejudice as a pattydefendant; and
ORDER
Case No. 11-353-AC
1
(4)
Both parties shall bear their own costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED.i"<~Of @}1'201l.
P«J
( ) ("
IJ
;)
.
UNITED TATES ~e:r roD E
/
Respectfully submitted by:
DWIGHT C. HOLTON
United States Attorney
/ s/ Ouinn P. Harrington
JEREMY N. HENDON
QUINN P. HARRINGTON
Trial Attorneys, Tax Division
U.S. Department ofJustice
P.O. Box 683, Ben Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044
Telephone: (202) 353-2466
(202) 514-6507
Facsimile: (202) 307-0054
Email: Ieremy.Hendon@usdoj.gov
Ouinn.P.Harrington@usdoj.gov
Wcstern.Taxcivii@usdoj.gov
ORDER
Case No. 11-353-AC
2
Mw;:iclA-O+~
·tf'J~vpv-
•• -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?