United States of America v. Neal et al

Filing 24

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION BETWEEN UNITED STATES and BADGER CREEK NURSERY, LLC - (Grant Motion to Dismiss 19 . Defendant Badger Creek Nursery, LLC is DISMISSED with prejudice as a party-defendant; and both parties shall bear their own costs. Dated this 5th day of May, 2011, by U.S. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Civil No. 11-353-AC Plaintiff, ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION BETWEEN UNITED STATES AND BADGER CREEK NURSERY, LLC v. TERRY L. NEAL; BADGER CREEK NURSERY. LLC; MICHAEL NEAL. individually. as Personal Representative of the Estate of Maureen Gail Neal. Deceased, and as Trustee of Neal Family Trust; SHANNON NEAL; STEVE MARTIN CONSTRUCTION. INC; HOEVET & BOISE. P.C.; NEAL FAMILY TRUST; and CLACKAMAS COUNTY Defendants. Pursuant to the Stipulation Re: Disclaimer of Interest by Badger Creek NursClY, LLC, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: (1) The Stipulation Re: Disclaimer of Interest by Badger Creek Nursely, LLC, is hereby approved; (2) Badger Creek NurselY, LLC, has no interest in the property described in the stipulation and in paragraph 13 of the United States' complaint or in any proceeds from the sale of the property; (3) Defendant Badger Creek Nursery, LLC is DISMISSED with prejudice as a pattydefendant; and ORDER Case No. 11-353-AC 1 (4) Both parties shall bear their own costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED.i"<~Of @}1'201l. P«J ( ) (" IJ ;) . UNITED TATES ~e:r roD E / Respectfully submitted by: DWIGHT C. HOLTON United States Attorney / s/ Ouinn P. Harrington JEREMY N. HENDON QUINN P. HARRINGTON Trial Attorneys, Tax Division U.S. Department ofJustice P.O. Box 683, Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044 Telephone: (202) 353-2466 (202) 514-6507 Facsimile: (202) 307-0054 Email: Ieremy.Hendon@usdoj.gov Ouinn.P.Harrington@usdoj.gov Wcstern.Taxcivii@usdoj.gov ORDER Case No. 11-353-AC 2 Mw;:iclA-O+~ ·tf'J~vpv- •• -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?