Bernard et al v. Myers et al
Filing
46
STIPULATED ORDER TO DISMISS Defendant Neal Rendleman M.D. with Prejudice and Without Costs. See 2-page order attached. Signed on 5/2/2012 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
Lindsey H. Hughes, OSB #833857
lhughes@keatingjones.com
Jamie E. Valentine, OSB #075556
j valentine@keatingjones.com
Keating Jones Hughes PC
One SW Columbia, Suite 800
Portland, OR 97258-2095
Phone: (503) 222-9955
Fax: (503) 796-0699
Attorneys for Neal Rendleman, M.D.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND DIVISION
DIANE BERNARD, Personal Representative
Case No. 3:11-CV-00608 HZ
for the Estate of Robert Haws, DIANE
BERNARD,
STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
OF DEFENDANT NEAL RENDLEMAN,
Plaintiff,
M.D. WITH PREJUDICE AND
WITHOUT COSTS
v.
SHERIFF JASON MYERS, SGT. JOHN By Neal Rendleman, M.D.
McOMBER, LT. STEELE, DPTY.
VAUGHN, SGT. ADCOCK, PETE
DODSON, SENIOR DPTY. DONNA
HEFTY, SENIOR DPTY. ERIK
DOUGLASS, DPTY. KELOGG, DPTY.
PETERSON, SGT. JAMES COLEMAN,
DPTY. HARTL, SGT. JERRY HOGUE,
SENIOR DPTY. DAN WITT, DPTY.
ADAM GARNER, NURSE GAGE, NURSE
DONNA KENDALL, DR. RENDLEMAN,
OFC. HAYMAN, JOHN AND JANE DOES
#1-10, Employees of
Marion Co. Jail, and
MARION COUNTY, by and through the
Marion Co. Jail,
Defendants.
II I
II I
STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT
NEAL RENDLEMAN, M.D. WITH PREJUDICE AND
WITHOUT COSTS - Page 1
Doc No. 321601
Pursuant to the stipulation of
the parties, IT is HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs
claims against defendant Neal Rendleman, M.D., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs
to either party.
2nd
DA TED this _ day of
May
2012.
/s/ Marco A. Hernandez
HON. MARCO A. HERNANDEZ
IT is SO STIPULATED:
siMi
chelle R. Burrows
MICHELLE R. BURROWS, OSB No. 86160
Of Attorneys for Plaintiff
s/Lindsey H. Hughes
LINDSEY H. HUGHES, OSB No. 833857
Of Attorneys for Defendant Dr. Neal Rendleman
STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT
NEAL RENDLEMAN, M.D. WITH PREJUDICE AND
WITHOUT COSTS - Page 2
Doc No. 321601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?