Bernard et al v. Myers et al

Filing 46

STIPULATED ORDER TO DISMISS Defendant Neal Rendleman M.D. with Prejudice and Without Costs. See 2-page order attached. Signed on 5/2/2012 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)

Download PDF
Lindsey H. Hughes, OSB #833857 lhughes@keatingjones.com Jamie E. Valentine, OSB #075556 j valentine@keatingjones.com Keating Jones Hughes PC One SW Columbia, Suite 800 Portland, OR 97258-2095 Phone: (503) 222-9955 Fax: (503) 796-0699 Attorneys for Neal Rendleman, M.D. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION DIANE BERNARD, Personal Representative Case No. 3:11-CV-00608 HZ for the Estate of Robert Haws, DIANE BERNARD, STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT NEAL RENDLEMAN, Plaintiff, M.D. WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT COSTS v. SHERIFF JASON MYERS, SGT. JOHN By Neal Rendleman, M.D. McOMBER, LT. STEELE, DPTY. VAUGHN, SGT. ADCOCK, PETE DODSON, SENIOR DPTY. DONNA HEFTY, SENIOR DPTY. ERIK DOUGLASS, DPTY. KELOGG, DPTY. PETERSON, SGT. JAMES COLEMAN, DPTY. HARTL, SGT. JERRY HOGUE, SENIOR DPTY. DAN WITT, DPTY. ADAM GARNER, NURSE GAGE, NURSE DONNA KENDALL, DR. RENDLEMAN, OFC. HAYMAN, JOHN AND JANE DOES #1-10, Employees of Marion Co. Jail, and MARION COUNTY, by and through the Marion Co. Jail, Defendants. II I II I STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT NEAL RENDLEMAN, M.D. WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT COSTS - Page 1 Doc No. 321601 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT is HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs claims against defendant Neal Rendleman, M.D., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party. 2nd DA TED this _ day of May 2012. /s/ Marco A. Hernandez HON. MARCO A. HERNANDEZ IT is SO STIPULATED: siMi chelle R. Burrows MICHELLE R. BURROWS, OSB No. 86160 Of Attorneys for Plaintiff s/Lindsey H. Hughes LINDSEY H. HUGHES, OSB No. 833857 Of Attorneys for Defendant Dr. Neal Rendleman STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT NEAL RENDLEMAN, M.D. WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT COSTS - Page 2 Doc No. 321601

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?