White v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
Filing
26
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation 24 . Accordingly, defendants' Motion to Dismiss 9 is granted and this case is dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 4/2/2012 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (tll)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND DIVISION
JOANN M. WHITE,
3: ll-cv-1209-ST
.Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; BAC HOME
LOANS SERVICING, a LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP; RECONTRUST
COMPANY, N.A.; FEDERAL NATIONAL
MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION; and
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.,
Defendants.
Michael D. O'Brien
OLIVEROS & O'BRIEN PC
9200 SE Sunnybrook Blvd, Ste 150
Clackamas, OR 97015
Robert M. Hildum
SUNDERLAND & ASSOCIATES
10121 SE Sunnyside Road, Ste 300
Clackamas, OR 97015
Attorneys for Plaintiff
I-ORDER
Julie Engbloom
Pilar C. French
LANE POWELL, PC
601 SW Second Avenue, Ste 2100
Portland, OR 97204
Attorneys for Defendants
HERNANDEZ, District Judge:
Ma;gistra;te Judge Janice M. Stewart issued a; Findings and Recommenda;tion (doc. #24)
on March 6, 2012, recommending that defendants' Motion to Dismiss (doc. #9) be granted and
this ca;se be dismissed.
Beca;use no objections to the Ma;gistra;te Judge's Findings and Recommenda;tion were
timely filed, I am relieved of my obliga;tion to review the record de novo. United Smtes v.
Reyna-Tapi!!, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Crr. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,
840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Crr. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions ofMa;gistrate
Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de
novo, I find no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Ma;gistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommenda;tion (doc.
#24). Accordingly, defendants' Motion to Dismiss (doc. #9) is granted and this ca;se is
dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this
)..
da;yof
ap~J
,2012.
United States District Judge
2-0RDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?