White v. Bank of America, N.A. et al

Filing 26

ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation 24 . Accordingly, defendants' Motion to Dismiss 9 is granted and this case is dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 4/2/2012 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (tll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION JOANN M. WHITE, 3: ll-cv-1209-ST .Plaintiff, ORDER v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, a LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A.; FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION; and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants. Michael D. O'Brien OLIVEROS & O'BRIEN PC 9200 SE Sunnybrook Blvd, Ste 150 Clackamas, OR 97015 Robert M. Hildum SUNDERLAND & ASSOCIATES 10121 SE Sunnyside Road, Ste 300 Clackamas, OR 97015 Attorneys for Plaintiff I-ORDER Julie Engbloom Pilar C. French LANE POWELL, PC 601 SW Second Avenue, Ste 2100 Portland, OR 97204 Attorneys for Defendants HERNANDEZ, District Judge: Ma;gistra;te Judge Janice M. Stewart issued a; Findings and Recommenda;tion (doc. #24) on March 6, 2012, recommending that defendants' Motion to Dismiss (doc. #9) be granted and this ca;se be dismissed. Beca;use no objections to the Ma;gistra;te Judge's Findings and Recommenda;tion were timely filed, I am relieved of my obliga;tion to review the record de novo. United Smtes v. Reyna-Tapi!!, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Crr. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Crr. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions ofMa;gistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Ma;gistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommenda;tion (doc. #24). Accordingly, defendants' Motion to Dismiss (doc. #9) is granted and this ca;se is dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this ).. da;yof ap~J ,2012. United States District Judge 2-0RDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?