Massey v. Thomas

Filing 21

ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 16 . Petitioner's Petition 2 is denied. This proceeding is dismissed. Signed on 4/23/2012 by U.S. District Judge Michael R. Hogan. (jw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
STEPHEN COLLIS MASSEY,
Petitioner,
3:ll-cv-01294-TC

v.
ORDER
J.E. THOMAS,
Respondent.
Magistrate

Judge

Thomas

M.

Coffin

filed

Findings

and

Recommendation on March 16, 2012, in the above entitled case.
The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

§

636(b) (1) (B)

When either party objects to any

portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, the
district court must make a de

DQYQ

of the magistrate judge's report.

determination of that portion
~

28 U.S.C.

§

636(b) (1);

McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines. Inc.,
1

- ORDER

656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920
(1982) .
Petitioner has timely filed objections.

I

have, therefore,

given de novo review of Magistrate Judge Coffin's rulings.
I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge

Coffin's Findings and Recommendation filed March 16, 2012, in
its entirety.

Petitioner's petition

proceeding is dismissed.

(#2)

is denied.

This

The clerk of court will enter judgment

accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this

2

- ORDER

~"2-~
day

~

of

L,t }

-~-4+,-.:-!.~L------'

2012.