Goode et al v. MeDeiros et al

Filing 8

Order. It is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED. Because the dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint was based upon substantive deficiencies which Plaintiff did not cure, the dismissal is WITH PREJUDICE. Signed on 01/19/2012 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND DIVISION
YVONNE JOE GOODE, and
CHARLES MARVIN GOODE,
Case No. 3:11-cv-01461-BR
Plaintiffs,
ORDER
v.

RUTH HALDERMAN, and
DELORIS MEDERIOS,
Defendants.
BROWN, Judge.
Plaintiff's bring this civil action pro se.

On December 9,

2011, this Court issued an Order dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint
pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§

1915(e) (2).

The Order advised Plaintiffs

of the deficiencies of the Complaint and granted them leave to
file

an

amended

deficiencies.

1 - ORDER -

complaint

within

30

days

curing

those

Plaintiffs were advised that failure to file an

amended complaint within the time provided would result in the
dismissal of this action.
Plaintiffs did not file an amended complaint within the time
provided.

Accordingly,

IT

IS

ORDERED

that

this

action

is

DISMISSED.

Because the dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint was

based upon substantive deficiencies which Plaintiff did not cure,
the dismissal is WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this

I~

day of

ANNA J. BROWN
United States District Judge

2 - ORDER -

F:\Share\Brown-LawClerks\11-1461goodeOllOorder,wpd