Anaeme v. United States of America et al

Filing 7

ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation 5 . Accordingly, plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 1 is granted, and the Complaint 2 is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Signed on 4/16/2012 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (tll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION CHIBUEZE C. ANAEME, Plaintiff, No. 3:12-cv-418-ST v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., ORDER Defendants. HERNANDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Stewart issued a Findings and Recommendation (#5) on March 14, 2011, in which she recommends that this Court grant plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, but dismiss his Complaint with prejudice because it fails to state a claim, seeks monetary relief against defendants who are immune, and is frivolous. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. 1 - ORDER Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation [5]. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [1] is granted, and the Complaint [2] is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 16th day of April, 2012. s/Marco A. Hernandez MARCO A. HERNANDEZ United States District Judge 2 - ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?