Baldin et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
138
OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Acostas recommendation, and I ADOPT the F&R 133 as my own opinion. Signed on 12/6/13 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND DIVISION
AMY BALDIN, an individual and as sole
manager of LUGANO PROPERTIES 4,
LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company,
No. 3:12-cv-00648-AC
Plaintiff,
OPINION AND ORDER
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a National
Bank registered to do business in Oregon, and
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, a
division of WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Defendants.
MOSMAN, J.,
Judge Acosta recommended [133] that Plaintiff Amy Baldin’s motion for leave to file a
third amended complaint be granted in part and denied in part. Neither party filed objections.
DISCUSSION
The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may
file written objections. I am not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge; instead,
I retain responsibility for making the final determination. I am required to review de novo those
portions of the report or any specified findings or recommendations within it to which an
objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, I am not required to review, de novo or
1 – OPINION AND ORDER
under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those
portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140,
149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level
of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R depends on whether objections have
been filed, in either case I am free to accept, reject, or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1).
Upon review, I agree with Judge Acosta’s recommendation, and I ADOPT the F&R
[133] as my own opinion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this
6th
day of December, 2013.
/s/ Michael W. Mosman
MICHAEL W. MOSMAN
United States District Judge
2 – OPINION AND ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?