Walker-Hill et al v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
Filing
18
ORDER: The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation 15 . Accordingly, Defendant Saxon Mortgage Services Inc.'s motion to dismiss 8 is granted. Signed on 3/1/2013 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND DIVISION
REGINA WALKER-HILL,
No. 03:12-cv-02162-ST
Plaintiff,
v.
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST
COMPANY, a citizen of California,
SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.,
a Texas corporation
Defendants.
Raylynna J Peterson
Peterson Law Group, PC
3537 N. Williams Avenue, Suite 101
Portland, OR 97227
Attorney for Plaintiff
Bruce C. Hamlin
Martin, Bischoff, Templeton, Langslet
& Hoffman LLP
888 SW 5th Avenue
900 Pioneer Tower
Portland, OR 97204-2023
ORDER
Calon N. Russell
Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP
1000 SW Broadway, Suite 1250
Portland, OR 97205-3078
Attorneys for Defendants
HERNANDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Stewart issued a Findings and Recommendation (#15) on January 23,
2013, in which she recommends that this Court grant Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc.’s motion to
dismiss (#8). The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were
timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,
840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate
Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de
novo, I find no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Stewart’s Findings and Recommendation (#15).
Accordingly, Defendant Saxon Mortgage Services Inc.’s motion to dismiss (#8) is granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this
day of February, 2013.
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?