Baum et al v. Columbia County, et al
Filing
5
Temporary Restraining Order. Plaintiff are required to provide security in the amount of $2,000, which this Court finds proper to pay the costs and damages sustained in the event that the temporary restraining order is wrongful. Defendan ts are ordered to appear before this Court on Tuesday, January 22, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., to show cause why the preliminary injunction sought by Plaintiffs should not be granted. Defendants shall file a responsive brief to Plaintiffs' Application for TRO and Preliminary Injunction by 4:00 p.m. on Friday, January 11, 2013. Plaintiffs'reply is due by 12:00 p.m., January 16, 2013. See 2-page order attached. Signed on 1/7/2013 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this order upon the defendants or their counsel. (mr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND DIVISION
JANE S. BAUM, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
No. 3:13-cv-00011-HZ
TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING
ORDER
v.
COLUMBIA COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.
HERNANDEZ, District Judge:
Now before me is Plaintiff’s [sic] Application for a Temporary Restraining Order
and Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum in Support Thereof (“Application for TRO
and Preliminary Injunction”) (doc. #3) filed pursuant to rule 65 of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure (“Rule”). Jane S. Baum (“Baum”) and Viewcrest Farms, LLC
1 – TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
(“Viewcrest”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) seek to prohibit the disposition of
“approximately 167 head of cattle by foreclosure sale” on January 14, 2013, by Columbia
County, Henry Heimuller (“Heimuller”), Tony Hyde (“Hyde”), and Earl Fisher
(“Fisher”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Compl., ¶¶ 1, 39; Id., Ex. G, pp. 1-8.
Based on the record before me, I conclude Plaintiffs are entitled to a temporary
restraining order pending a hearing on their request for a preliminary injunction. At this
time, I find that a temporary restraining order is necessary to prevent Plaintiffs’ “[l]oss of
livelihood derived form [sic] the breeding and sale of cattle.” Appl. for TRO and Prelim.
Inj., p. 13.
Pursuant to this temporary restraining order, Defendants are prohibited from
selling or otherwise disposing of the cattle. Plaintiffs, however, are required to provide
security in the amount of $2,000, which this Court finds proper to pay the costs and
damages sustained in the event that the temporary restraining order is wrongful. See Fed.
R. Civ. P. 65(c).
Defendants are ordered to appear before this Court on Tuesday, January 22, 2013,
at 10:00 a.m., to show cause why the preliminary injunction sought by Plaintiffs should
not be granted. Defendants shall file a responsive brief to Plaintiffs’ Application for
TRO and Preliminary Injunction by 4:00 p.m. on Friday, January 11, 2013. Plaintiffs’
reply is due by 12:00 p.m., January 16, 2013.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this
day of ____________, 2013.
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ
United States District Judge
2 – TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?