Fredrickson et al v. Starbucks Corporation

Filing 90

ORDER. Accordingly, I ADOPT both of Magistrate Judge Hubel's Findings and Recommendations (#87, #88). IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to the Bill of Costs (#61), Defendant is awarded costs in the total sum of $350.00. Defendant's Motion for Attorney's Fees (#57) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 09/23/2014 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (pvh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
HANNAH FREDRICKSON, ASHLEY
KRENING, and MAURIALEE BRACKE,

3:13-cv-00029-HU
ORDER

Plaintiffs,

v.
STARBUCKS CORPORATION,
a Washington corporation,
Defendant.
MARSH, Judge
Magistrate Judge Hubel issued a Findings and Recommendation
(#87)

on August 7,

2014,

recommending that Defendant should be

awarded $350 in costs under Defendant's Bill of Costs (#61).

That

same day Judge Hubel issued a second Findings and Recommendation
(#88)

recommending that

(#57) should be denied.
U.S.C.

§

Defendant's Motion for Attorney's

Fees

The matter is now before me pursuant to 28

636(b) (1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

Neither party has

timely filed objections to either Findings and Recommendation.
When neither party objects to a Magistrate Judge's Findings
and Recommendation,

1 - ORDER

this Court is relieved of its obligation to

review the record de novo.
1114,

1121

(9th Cir.

United States v. Revna-Tapia, 328 F.3d

2003) (en bane);

Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444

see also United States v.

(9th Cir. 1988).

Having reviewed

the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
Accordingly, I ADOPT both of Magistrate Judge Hubel's Findings
and Recommendations (#87, #88).

IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to the

Bill of Costs (#61), Defendant is awarded costs in the total sum of
$350.00.

Defendant's Motion for Attorney's Fees (#57) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this

Z'3 day of September, 2014.

lzz~ ..;- t?!~

Malcolm F. Marsh
United States District Judge

2 - ORDER