Robinson et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al

Filing 153

OPINION AND ORDER. Despite prior rulings in this case, plaintiffs complaint continues to be a rambling recitation of unconnected events across many years of time and several states. She appears to be listing almost any indignity she has suffered. Even read generously, the complaint fails to state any claim on which relief can be granted. This is plaintiffs third try. This case is therefore dismissed with prejudice. Signed on 6/28/13 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION BRANDY ROBINSON and J.H., No. 3:13-cv-00205-MO Plaintiffs, OPINION AND ORDER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al., Defendants. MOSMAN, J., Despite prior rulings in this case, plaintiff’s complaint continues to be a rambling recitation of unconnected events across many years of time and several states. She appears to be listing almost any indignity she has suffered. Even read generously, the complaint fails to state any claim on which relief can be granted. This is plaintiff’s third try. This case is therefore dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 28th day of June, 2013. /s/ Michael W. Mosman MICHAEL W. MOSMAN United States District Judge 1 – OPINION AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?