Probuilders Specialty Insurance Company, RRG v. Lone Oak Construction, Inc et al

Filing 20

STIPULATED ORDER TO STAY CASE WITH LIMITED MUTUAL DISCOVERY: (Granting, in part, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or Stay or, in the Alternative, For a More Definite Statement 6 ; Granting the parties' Stipulated Motion for Stay 19 .) Signed on 5/3/13 by Magistrate Judge Dennis J. Hubel. (kb)

Download PDF
Tyson L. Calvert, OSB #032809 Email: tcalvert@lindsayhart.com Gavin W. Bruce, OSB # 113384 Email: gbruce@lindsayhart.com LINDSAY HART, LLP 1300 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 3400 Portland, Oregon 97201-5640 Phone: 503-226-7677 Fax: 503-226-7697 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION PROBUILDERS SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, RRG, a District of Columbia Risk Retention Group, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:13-cv-00318-HU STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO STAY CASE WITH LIMITED MUTUAL DISCOVERY v. LONE OAK CONSTRUCTION, an inactive Oregon cm·poration; and MSCI 2007-IQ13 GRESHAM COMPLEX, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, Defendants. A dispute exists between Plaintiff ProBuilders Specialty Insurance Company, RRG ("Plaintiff'') and Defendant MSCI 2007-IQ13 Gresham Complex, LLC ("Defendant Gresham Complex") as to whether there exists grounds to stay or dismiss this case without prejudice pending resolution of MSCI 2007-IQ13 Gresham Complex, LLC v. Myhre Group Architects, Inc., et. a!., Multnomah County Circuit Coutt Case No. 1201-01319 ("Underlying Lawsuit") that gives rise to this coverage lawsuit. On March 29, 2013, Gresham Complex moved to dismiss or stay in the case or, in the altemative, for a more definite statement. There parties have thereafter had additional Page 1- STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO STAY CASE WITH LIMITED MUTUAL DISCOVERY {00650176; I} LINDSAYHART,LLP discussions, to resolve the issues between them so as to make efficient use of their own resources and those of the Comt. 1 Based on those discussions, counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant Gresham Complex have agreed to present the stipulation for a stay set fmth below to the Comt and move the Comt to enter their stipulated motion STIPULATED MOTION PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT GRESHAM COMPLEX DO HEREBY STIPULATE AND MOVE THE COURT AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, on Februmy 22, 2013, Plaintiff ProBuilders filed the instant action seeking declaratory relief that cettain insurance policies it issued to Defendant Lone Oak, do not include a duty, or an obligation, to defend or indemnizy Defendant Lone Oak in the Underlying Lawsuit; WHEREAS, the Underlying Lawsuit relates, in pmt, to Defendant Lone Oak's activities as a contractor at a project known as The Crossings at Gresham Station, which is the subject matter of the Underlying Lawsuit. In patticular, Defendant Gresham Complex claims various allegations against Defendant Lone Oak related to its responsibility for the construction of The Crossings; WHEREAS, Defendant Lone Oak tendered the claims raised by Defendant Gresham Complex to Plaintiff for defense and indemnity, and Plaintiff accepted the defense subject to a reservation of rights; WHEREAS, in response to Plaintiffs complaint, Defendant Gresham Complex brought a motion to dismiss/motion to stay this lawsuit; WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant Gresham Complex have met and conferred and reached an agreement as to the resolution of said motion; WHEREFORE, in the interests of conservation ofjudicial resources and those of the parties and for good cause Plaintiff and Defendant Gresham Complex agree that the Comt shall enter an order (I) staying the complaint filed by Plaintiff as against Defendant Gresham Complex and 1 Defendant Lone Oak Construction, Inc. ("Defendant Lone Oak") has not appeared in this case but would be subject to the stipulated stay with limited discovery order. Page 2- STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO STAY CASE WITH LIMITED MUTUAL DISCOVERY (00650176; t} LINDSAY HART, LLP Defendant Lone Oak until 30 days after judgment is entered (either as a result of an order, verdict, or settlement) in the Underlying Lawsuit; and (2) allowing limited mutual discovery during the pendency of the stay related to the application, underwriting, issuance and sale of the ProBuilders' insurance policies which may include (i) the issuance of subpoenas to third parties and (ii) document discovery of the parties. The patties may seek fmther expansion of these limited discovery measures during the pendency of this stay by stipulation or leave of the comt. Dated this 261h day of April, 2013. LINDSAY HART, LLP s/ Tyson L. Calvert By: ~T~y-so-n~L~.~C~a'lv-ert~,~O~S~B~N~o-.0~3~2~80~9~------------- tcalvert@lindsayhart.com Gavin W. Bruce, OSB No. 113384 gbruce@lindsayhatt.com Attorneys for Plaintiff STOEL RIVES LLP s/ Scott J. Kaplan SCOTT J. KAPLAN, OSB No. 913350 sjkaplan@stoel.com LOUIS A. FERREIRA, IV, OSB No. 902602 laferreira@stoel.com Telephone: (503) 224-3380 Attorneys for Defendant Gresham Complex IT IS SO ORDERED this '3P.!l> day of_LM---'L>._>q-f--~-·· \ 20 13~ \ ~ Honorab~t~-Iubel U.S. Dis1!:9agistrate Judge Page 3- STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO STAY CASE WITH LIMITED MUTUAL DISCOVERY {00650176; I} LINDSAY HART, LLP CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE In addition to the electronic filing and service of this document through the CMIECF system of the U.S. District Court, I hereby certifY that on April 26, 2013, I served a copy of the STIPULATED MOTION FOR STAY OF THE CASE WITH LIMITED MUTUAL DISCOVERY on the following person in the manner indicated below at the following address: M. Patton Echols Attorney at Law P.O. Box 1768 Gresham OR 97030 Attomey for Defendant Lone Oak Construction D D [8J D D by Electronic Mail by Facsimile Transmission by First Class Mail by Hand Delivery by Overnight Delivery s/ Tyson L. Calvert By: ~--~~--~~~~~~~------------- Tyson L. Calvett, OSB No. 032809 tcalvett@lindsayhart.com Gavin W. Bruce, OSB No. 113384 gbruce@lindsayhatt.com Attomeys for Plaintiff CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE LINDSAY HART, LLP 1300 SW FIFTH A VENUE, SUITE 3400 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-5640 PHONE: 503-226-7677 FAX: 503-226-7697

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?