Oliver v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 26

ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivans Findings & Recommendation 24 , and therefore, Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees 23 is granted. Signed on 2/21/2017 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (sss)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON DALE OLIVER, Plaintiff, No. 3:13-cv-00449-SU v. ORDER NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Sullivan issued a Findings and Recommendation [24] on January 10, 2017, in which she recommends that this Court grant Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees Under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. 1 – ORDER Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan’s Findings & Recommendation [24], and therefore, Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees [23] is granted. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this ___________________ day of _________________________, 2017. ________________________________________________ MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge 2 – ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?