Curtean-Garland et al v. Winco Holdings, Inc., et al

Filing 18

ORDER. Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Hubel's Finding and Recommendation 16 . IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to remand 9 is GRANTED, and this action is remanded to Multnomah County Circuit Court for further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 07/08/2013 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (pvh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 3:13-cv-00501-HU MONICA CURTEAN-GARLAND, ORDER Plaintiff, v. WINCO HOLDINGS, INC., an Idaho Corporation, et al., Defendants. MARSH, Judge Magistrate Dennis Judge Recommendation on June 14, Hubel 2013, issued his Findings and recommending that plaintiff's motion to remand be granted and this matter remanded to Multnomah County Circuit Court for further proceedings. before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 72(b). ยง 636(b) (1) The matter is now and Fed. R. Civ. P. No objections have been timely filed. When neither party objects to a Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, this court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. 1114, 1121 1 - ORDER (9th Cir. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 2003) (en bane); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Recommendation #16. remand (#9) IT Hubel' s Finding and IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to is GRANTED, and this action is remanded to Multnomah County Circuit Court for further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this I?' day of July, 2013. Malcolm F. Marsh United States District Judge 2 - ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?