Curtean-Garland et al v. Winco Holdings, Inc., et al
Filing
18
ORDER. Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Hubel's Finding and Recommendation 16 . IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to remand 9 is GRANTED, and this action is remanded to Multnomah County Circuit Court for further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 07/08/2013 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (pvh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
3:13-cv-00501-HU
MONICA CURTEAN-GARLAND,
ORDER
Plaintiff,
v.
WINCO HOLDINGS, INC., an Idaho
Corporation, et al.,
Defendants.
MARSH, Judge
Magistrate
Dennis
Judge
Recommendation on June
14,
Hubel
2013,
issued
his
Findings
and
recommending that plaintiff's
motion to remand be granted and this matter remanded to Multnomah
County Circuit Court for further proceedings.
before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
72(b).
ยง
636(b) (1)
The matter is now
and Fed.
R.
Civ.
P.
No objections have been timely filed.
When neither party objects to a Magistrate Judge's Findings
and Recommendation,
this court is relieved of its obligation to
review the record de novo.
1114,
1121
1 - ORDER
(9th Cir.
United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d
2003) (en bane);
see also United States v.
Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444
(9th Cir. 1988).
Having reviewed
the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
Accordingly,
I
ADOPT Magistrate Judge
Recommendation #16.
remand (#9)
IT
Hubel' s
Finding and
IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to
is GRANTED, and this action is remanded to Multnomah
County Circuit Court for further proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this
I?'
day of July, 2013.
Malcolm F. Marsh
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?