Phillips v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 20

OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Hubels recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 18 as my own opinion. Signed on 1/13/15 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dsg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION TIM PHILLIPS No. 3:13-cv-00603-HU Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MOSMAN, J., On December 1, 2014, Magistrate Judge Hubel issued his Findings and Recommendation (F&R) [18]. Hubel recommends that the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security be remanded for two reasons: (1) to obtain further vocational testimony regarding the effect of Phillips’ mental limitations on his ability to work, and (2) to clarify the reaching requirements of jobs identified by the Vocational Expert (VE). No objections to the Findings and Recommendation were filed. DISCUSSION The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or 1 – OPINION AND ORDER recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Upon review, I agree with Judge Hubel’s recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R [18] as my own opinion. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 13th day of January, 2015. /s/ Michael W. Mosman ___ MICHAEL W. MOSMAN United States District Judge 2 – OPINION AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?