Crow v. Brooks Motor Company et al

Filing 62

ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Stewart's Findings and Recommendation 60 . Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendant's Motion 24 for Summary Judgment. Signed on 12/30/2014 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See attached 2 page Order for full text. (bb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

LARRY DEAN CROW,
Plaintiff,
v.
BROOKS MOTOR CO., an Oregon
corporation; and GARY BROOKS,
Defendants.
______________________________
GARY BROOKS,
Counterclaimant,
v.
LARRY DEAN CROW,
Counterclaim Defendant.

1 - ORDER

3:13-cv-00757-ST
ORDER

BROWN, Judge.
Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued Findings and
Recommendation (#60) on November 10, 2014, in which she
recommends this Court deny Defendants’ Motion (#24) for Summary
Judgment.

The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and
Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its
obligation to review the record de novo.
561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009).

See Dawson v. Marshall,

See also United States v.

Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc).
Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not
find any error.

CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and
Recommendation (#60).

Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendant's

Motion (#24) for Summary Judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 30th day of December, 2014.
/s/ Anna J. Brown
ANNA J. BROWN
United States District Judge

2 - ORDER