Bark v. Northrop et al

Filing 29

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. See 2-page order attached. Signed on 11/8/2013 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON BARK, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:13-cv-01267-ST v. LISA NORTHROP, Forest Supervisor of the Mt. Hood National Forest, and U.S. FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency, TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Defendants. HERNANDEZ, District Judge: Plaintiff Bark's motion for a temporary restraining order(# 21), which the Court previously denied as moot, was reopened pursuant to Order(# 28). Having reviewed and considered the motion and supporting documents, the temporary restraining order ("TRO") is necessary to prevent the irreparable injury resulting from logging activities. 1- TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER From _ 4:25_ _-,-p.m. on November 8, 2013 , the TROis GRANTED as follows : _ Defendants and any private, state, or local entities or individuals operating under instructions or authorization from defendants, or under contract with defendants, are temporarily restrained from authorizing, allowing, carrying out, or continuing any ground-disturbing or vegetation-disturbing activities on federally-managed lands associated with the Jazz Thinning Project, except as provided in this TRO. This TRO does not prohibit the federal Defendants from authorizing Interfor to remove the logs cut on unit 37 of the Bass Sale during the week of November 4-8, 2013 , with the self-loading log truck, subject to any conditions the Forest Service' s contracting officials may require. The security requirement of Rule 65(c) is waived. Pursuant to Rule 65(b), this TRO shall expire in 14 days on November 22, 2013 . The TRO may be extended for good cause, such as the filing of a motion for preliminary injunction. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this _2_ day ofNovember, 2013 United States District Judge 2- TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?