Fredrickson et al v. Starbucks Corporation

Filing 37

ORDER: Magistrate Judge Hubel GRANTED Plaintiffs Emergency Motion for Stay 30 . Defendant objected 33 , arguing that the magistrate judge erred in staying this matter. Plaintiffs responded 36 . Upon review, I find that Judge Hubels order is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. The objection 33 is overruled. Signed on 4/9/14 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND DIVISION
HANNAH FREDRICKSON,
ASHLEY KRENING, and
MAURIALEE BRACKE, on behalf
of themselves individually and on
behalf of others similarly situated,
No: 3:13-cv- 02041-HU
Plaintiffs,
ORDER
v.
STARBUCKS CORPORATION,
a Washington corporation,
Defendant.
MOSMAN, J.,
Magistrate Judge Hubel GRANTED Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion for Stay [30].
Defendant objected [33], arguing that the magistrate judge erred in staying this matter. Plaintiffs
responded [36]. Upon review, I find that Judge Hubel’s order is not clearly erroneous or
contrary to law. The objection [33] is overruled.
DATED this

9th

day of April, 2014.

/s/ Michael W. Mosman
MICHAEL W. MOSMAN
United States District Court
1 – ORDER