Sanders v. Feather

Filing 17

ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings and Recommendation 11 and, therefore, DENIES the Petition 1 for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and DISMISSES this matter with prejudice.Signed on 09/25/2014 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

JASON THOMAS SANDERS,
Petitioner,

3:14-CV-00223-JE
ORDER

v.
MARION FEATHER, Warden,
FCI Sheridan
Respondent.

BROWN, Judge.
Magistrate Judge John Jelderks issued Findings and
Recommendation (#11) on July 11, 2014,

in which he recommends the

Court deny Petitioner Jason Thomas Sanders's Petition (#1)

for

Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and enter a
judgment dismissing this matter with prejudice.

Petitioner filed

timely Objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

The matter

is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) and
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
1 - ORDER

When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate
Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make
a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's
report.
F.3d 930,

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l).

See also Dawson v. Marshall,

561

932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328

F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en bane).
This Court has carefully considered Petitioner's Objections
and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings
and Recommendation.

The Court also has reviewed the pertinent

portions of the record de nova and does not find any error in the
Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings and
Recommendation (#11) and, therefore, DENIES the Petition (#1) for
Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and DISMISSES
this matter with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 25th day of September, 2014.

ANN~

United States District Judge

2 - ORDER