Williamson v. Kaiser Permanente et al
Filing
37
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings & Recommendation 34 . Accordingly, this action is dismissed with prejudice. See 2-page order attached. Signed on 1/5/2015 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
TYRONE ADAM WILLIAMSON,
Plaintiff,
No. 03:14-cv-00590-AC
v.
KAISER PERMANENTE and DAVID
SUNGEYUN CHO,
ORDER
Defendants.
HERNANDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation (#34) on December 1,
2014, in which he recommends that this Court dismiss the action with prejudice for failure to
prosecute. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were
timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,
840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate
1 - ORDER
Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de
novo, I find no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings & Recommendation [34].
Accordingly, this action is dismissed with prejudice. .
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this
day of
, 2015.
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?