Orr v. Peterson et al
Filing
33
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings & Recommendation 31 , and therefore, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 24 is granted. See 2-page order attached. Signed on 5/12/2015 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
CORWIN DELANO ORR,
Plaintiff,
No. 3:14-cv-00833-AC
v.
DERRICK PETERSON, MARK
HALE-BROWN, STEVE PINA,
and DARLENE FELIX,
ORDER
Defendants.
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation [31] on April 9, 2015,
in which he recommends that this Court grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [24].
The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were
timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,
1 – ORDER
840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate
Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de
novo, I find no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta’s Findings & Recommendation [31], and
therefore, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [24] is granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this
day of
, 2015.
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ
United States District Judge
2 – ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?