Lukens v. Angelozzi
Filing
59
ORDER: Denying Motion to Dismiss 49 without prejudice. Denying Motion to Dismiss 57 without prejudice. Denying as Moot Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order 9 . Granting Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint 12 . Document #12-1 is the operative complaint in this matter. Denying as Moot Motion to Issue Summons 13 . Signed on 1/22/2015 by Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin. (plb) Corrected date filed on 1/23/2015 (plb).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF OREGON
TROY LUKENS,
Plaintiff,
3:14-cv-00959-TC
v.
ORDER
RICK ANGELOZZI, et al.,
Defendants.
COFFIN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff's Motion to issue summons
moot.
(#13)
is denied as
[defendants have filed waivers of service].
Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (#9)
is denied as moot.
[Plaintiff is no longer incarcerated].
Plaintiff's motion to file an amended complaint (#8) was
allowed by Judge Hernandez Order (#50).
However, that order
apparently applied to the proposed amended complaint attached
to plaintiff's motion
Second
Motion
to
(ie.
file
an
Document 8-1).
Amended
Plaintiff filed a
Complaint
(#12).
The
proposed complaint attached to that motion differs slightly
1 - ORDER
from the Amended Complaint (#8-1).
Accordingly, plaintiff's
Second Motion to File an Amended Complaint (#12) is allowed.
The Amended Complaint (#12-1) is the operative pleading before
the court.
No further amendments will be allowed.
Defendant Multnomah County Sheriff's Motion to Dismiss
(#49) is denied without prejudice to re-file as it may apply
to plaintiff (second) amended complaint (#12-1).
Defendants'
Motion to Dismiss
(#57)
is denied without
prejudice tore-file to the extent it may apply to plaintiff's
(second) Amended Complaint (#12-1) .
DATED this
~ay
of
Thomas M.
United States M gistrate Judge
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?