Richardson et al v. Shubert et al
ORDER. The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge You's Findings & Recommendation 168 . Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 157 is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 9/7/2017 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (pvh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
KELLY J. RICHARDSON, and JAMES
POWELL, personally and as next friend for
I.R., a minor; and S.P., a minor;
EMILIE SCHUBERT, in her individual
Capacity; GINGER VAN WINKLE, in
her individual capacity; ERIN WIRTZ,
in her individual capacity; JENNIE SMITH,
in her individual capacity; KRISTIN LEMON,
in her individual capacity; CARLOS CRUTCH,
in his individual capacity; LINDSEY VERNOOY,
in her individual capacity; DANIELLE SANTILI-DAY,
in her individual capacity;
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge You issued a Findings and Recommendation  on July 26, 2017, in
which she recommends that this Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
1 - ORDER
. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were
timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v.
Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of
Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal
principles de novo, the Court finds no error.
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge You’s Findings & Recommendation .
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment  is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this ________________ day of _________________________________ , 2017.
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?