Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Triple Nickel Pub et al
Filing
19
OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiffs' motion for entry of default judgment 18 is granted. Plaintiffs are awarded $12,000 in statutory damages, $5,500 in the attorney fees, and $455 in costs. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC., SONY/ATV
SONGS LLC, BERNARD EDWARDS
COMPANY LLC, EMI VIRGIN SONGS, INC.,
dba EMI Longitude Music, PWMP ACQUISITION
I LLC, dba Primary Wave Brian, HOT-CHA
MUSIC CO., UNICHAPPELL MUSIC INC.,
UNIVERSAL MUSIC MGB NA LLC, dba
Universal Music Careers, BEECHWOOD MUSIC
CORPORATION, E.O. SMITH MUSIC, EMI
BLACKWOOD MUSIC, INC., HIP CITY MUSIC,
INC., and HIFROST PUBLISHING,
Plaintiffs,
v.
TRIPLE NICKEL PUB, LLC, dba Triple Nickel
Pub, and FADI NABOULSI,
Defendants.
Loren D. Podwill
Nels J. Vulin
Bullivant Houser Bailey, PC
888 SW Fifth Ave., Ste. 300
Portland, OR 97204
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
1 - OPINION & ORDER
No. 3:14-cv-01093-HZ
OPINION & ORDER
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Plaintiffs move for entry of default judgment [18] against Defendants. The court grants
the motion and awards $12,000 in statutory damages, attorney fees of $5,500, and costs of $455.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs bring this action for copyright infringement under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C.
§ 101 et seq. Plaintiffs allege eight instances of willful copyright infringement based on
Defendants’ unauthorized public performance of musical compositions. Compl. ¶ 23. Plaintiffs
request that Defendants be enjoined from infringing on Plaintiffs’ copyrighted musical
compositions, statutory damages, attorney fees, and costs. Id. at 6.
STANDARD
Rule 55(a) requires the Clerk of the Court to enter an order of default if a party has failed
to timely plead or otherwise defend. “[U]pon default the factual allegations of the complaint,
except those relating to the amount of damages, will be taken as true.” Geddes v. United
Financial Group, 559 F.2d 557, 560 (9th Cir. 1977); SEC v. Wencke, 577 F.2d 619, 622 (9th Cir.
1977) (without an answer in the record, every well-pleaded allegation in the complaint is deemed
admitted). As to whether to enter a default judgment, the court has discretion. DIRECTV, Inc.
v. Hoa Huynh, 503 F.3d 847, 852 (9th Cir. 2007). In exercising its discretion, the court may
consider
(1) the possibility of prejudice to the plaintiff, (2) the merits of plaintiff’s
substantive claim, (3) the sufficiency of the complaint, (4) the sum of money at
stake in the action; (5) the possibility of a dispute concerning material facts; (6)
whether the default was due to excusable neglect, and (7) the strong policy
underlying the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure favoring decisions on the merits.
Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-72 (9th Cir. 1986). “[D]efault judgments are ordinarily
disfavored.” Id. at 1472.
2 - OPINION & ORDER
DISCUSSION
This case was filed on July 9, 2014. Defendants were served on July 16, 2014.
Affidavits of Service [11, 12]. Plaintiffs’ moved for entry of default, which was entered on
September 23, 2014. Clerk’s Entry of Default [16]. Before me is Plaintiffs’ motion for entry of
default judgment. Plaintiffs request statutory damages of $1,500 per violation, for a total of
$12,000 for the eight claims of copyright infringement. 1 Pls.’ Mem. 3. Plaintiffs also request
0F
$5,500 in attorney fees and $455 in costs. Vulin Decl. ¶ 7. The court has reviewed the
declarations in support of the motion and considering the seven factors, finds that entry of default
judgment is warranted.
CONCLUSION
Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs’ motion for entry of default judgment [18] is granted.
Plaintiffs are awarded $12,000 in statutory damages, $5,500 in the attorney fees, and $455 in
costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this
day of December, 2014.
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge
1
The court may award between $750 and $30,000 in statutory damages for violation of each
work. 17 U.S.C. § 504(c)(1).
3 - OPINION & ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?