Vogt v. Jefferson County Recorders Office

Filing 94

ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings andRecommendation (# 88 ). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants'Motion (# 35 ) for Summary Judgment and DISMISSES this matter withprejudice. Signed on 2/2/17 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (eo) Copy mailed to plaintiff.

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MATTHEW VOGT, 3:14-CV-01222-PK Plaintiff, ORDER v. JEFFERSON COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE and KATE ZEMKE, Defendants. BROWN, Judge. Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation (#88) on November 2, 2016, in which he recommends this Court grant Defendants' Motion (#35) and dismiss this matter with prejudice. this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. of Civil Procedure 72(b). 1 - ORDER ยง for Summary Judgment The matter is now before 636(b) (1) (B) and Federal Rule Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely f i s Court is obligation to review the record de novo. 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). ieved of its Dawson v. Marshall, See also United States v. a, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9"h Cir. 2003) (en bane). Reyna Having reviewed the legal principles novo, the Court does not 'I any error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation (#88). Mot Accordingly, Court GRANTS Defendants' (#35) for Summary Judgment and DISMISSES this matter with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 2nct day of February, 2017. ANNA J. BROWN United States Dist 2 - ORDER I ct Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?