Vogt v. Jefferson County Recorders Office
Filing
94
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings andRecommendation (# 88 ). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants'Motion (# 35 ) for Summary Judgment and DISMISSES this matter withprejudice. Signed on 2/2/17 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (eo) Copy mailed to plaintiff.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
MATTHEW VOGT,
3:14-CV-01222-PK
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
JEFFERSON COUNTY RECORDERS
OFFICE and KATE ZEMKE,
Defendants.
BROWN, Judge.
Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and
Recommendation (#88) on November 2, 2016, in which he recommends
this Court grant Defendants' Motion (#35)
and dismiss this matter with prejudice.
this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
of Civil Procedure 72(b).
1 - ORDER
ยง
for Summary Judgment
The matter is now before
636(b) (1) (B) and Federal Rule
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and
Recommendation were timely f i
s Court is
obligation to review the record de novo.
561 F.3d 930, 932
(9th Cir. 2009).
ieved of its
Dawson v. Marshall,
See also United States v.
a, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9"h Cir. 2003) (en bane).
Reyna
Having reviewed the legal principles
novo, the Court does not
'I
any error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and
Recommendation (#88).
Mot
Accordingly,
Court GRANTS Defendants'
(#35) for Summary Judgment and DISMISSES this matter with
prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 2nct day of February, 2017.
ANNA J. BROWN
United States Dist
2 - ORDER
I
ct Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?