Vogt v. Jefferson County Recorders Office

Filing 94

ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings andRecommendation (# 88 ). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants'Motion (# 35 ) for Summary Judgment and DISMISSES this matter withprejudice. Signed on 2/2/17 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (eo) Copy mailed to plaintiff.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MATTHEW VOGT,

3:14-CV-01222-PK
Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.

JEFFERSON COUNTY RECORDERS
OFFICE and KATE ZEMKE,
Defendants.

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and
Recommendation (#88) on November 2, 2016, in which he recommends
this Court grant Defendants' Motion (#35)
and dismiss this matter with prejudice.
this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
of Civil Procedure 72(b).

1 - ORDER

§

for Summary Judgment
The matter is now before

636(b) (1) (B) and Federal Rule

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and
Recommendation were timely f i

s Court is

obligation to review the record de novo.
561 F.3d 930, 932

(9th Cir. 2009).

ieved of its

Dawson v. Marshall,

See also United States v.

a, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9"h Cir. 2003) (en bane).

Reyna

Having reviewed the legal principles

novo, the Court does not

'I

any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and
Recommendation (#88).
Mot

Accordingly,

Court GRANTS Defendants'

(#35) for Summary Judgment and DISMISSES this matter with

prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 2nct day of February, 2017.

ANNA J. BROWN
United States Dist

2 - ORDER

I

ct Judge