Vogt v. Jefferson County Sheriff's Department et al

Filing 97

ORDER: Adopting the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation 88 . The Court Grants Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 44 and Dismisses this matter with prejudice. Signed on 3/22/17 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (gm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MATTHEW VOGT,

3:14-CV-01224-PK
Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.
JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S
DEPARTMENT, DEPUTY SKIDGEL,
and CAPTAIN HECKATHORN,
Defendants.
BROWN, Judge.
Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and
Recommendation (#88) on November 3, 2016, in which he recommends
this Court grant Defendants’ Motion (#44) for Summary Judgment
and dismiss this matter.

The matter is now before this Court

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 72(b).
1 - ORDER

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and
Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its
obligation to review the record de novo.
561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009).

See Dawson v. Marshall,

See also United States v.

Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc).
Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not
find any error.

CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak’s Findings and
Recommendation (#88).

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants’

Motion (#44) for Summary Judgment and DISMISSES this matter with
prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 22nd day of March, 2017.
/s/ Anna J. Brown
ANNA J. BROWN
United States District Judge

2 - ORDER