Vogt v. Jefferson County Sheriff's Department et al

Filing 97

ORDER: Adopting the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation 88 . The Court Grants Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 44 and Dismisses this matter with prejudice. Signed on 3/22/17 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (gm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MATTHEW VOGT, 3:14-CV-01224-PK Plaintiff, ORDER v. JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, DEPUTY SKIDGEL, and CAPTAIN HECKATHORN, Defendants. BROWN, Judge. Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation (#88) on November 3, 2016, in which he recommends this Court grant Defendants’ Motion (#44) for Summary Judgment and dismiss this matter. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). 1 - ORDER Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). See Dawson v. Marshall, See also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak’s Findings and Recommendation (#88). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion (#44) for Summary Judgment and DISMISSES this matter with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 22nd day of March, 2017. /s/ Anna J. Brown ANNA J. BROWN United States District Judge 2 - ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?