Vogt v. Jefferson County Sheriff's Department et al
ORDER: Adopting the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation 88 . The Court Grants Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 44 and Dismisses this matter with prejudice. Signed on 3/22/17 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (gm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S
DEPARTMENT, DEPUTY SKIDGEL,
and CAPTAIN HECKATHORN,
Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and
Recommendation (#88) on November 3, 2016, in which he recommends
this Court grant Defendants’ Motion (#44) for Summary Judgment
and dismiss this matter.
The matter is now before this Court
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil
1 - ORDER
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and
Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its
obligation to review the record de novo.
561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009).
See Dawson v. Marshall,
See also United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc).
Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not
find any error.
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak’s Findings and
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants’
Motion (#44) for Summary Judgment and DISMISSES this matter with
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 22nd day of March, 2017.
/s/ Anna J. Brown
ANNA J. BROWN
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?