Syrop v. Whole Foods Markets of the Pacific Northwest

Filing 29

Opinion and Order re Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 14 . ADOPTING Findings & Recommendation 27 . Signed on 11/12/15 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (jlr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION JOSHUA GABRIEL SYROP, No. 3:14-cv-01293-ST Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. WHOLEFOODSMARKETOFTHE PACIFIC NORTHWEST, a foreign corporation, Defendant. MOSMAN,J., On October 20, 2015, Magistrate Judge Janice Stewart issued her Findings and Recommendation (F&R) [27], recommending that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [14] should be GRANTED as to the claim for common law wrongful termination and DENIED as to the claim for violation of O.R.S. 659A.199. No objections to the Findings and Recommendation were filed. DISCUSSION The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). However, the court 1 - OPINION AND ORDER is not required to review, de nova or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 FJd 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F &R depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, or modify anypait of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). Upon review, I agree with Judge Stewart's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R [27] as my own opinion. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this (trday ofNovember, 2015. MICHAEL W. MOSMAN United States District Judge 2 - OPINION AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?