Sehat v. Progressive Universal Insurance Company
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings andRecommendation (# 219 ). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS WSCO'sMotion (# 201 ) to Dismiss, GRANTS Ryan Corbridge's Motion (# 203 )to Dismiss, GRANTS Progressive's Motion (# 211 ) to dismiss, andDISMISSES this matter with prejudice. Signed on 2/2/17 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (eo) Copy mailed to plaintiff.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
SUBRINA POUPAK SEHAT,
PROGRESSIVE UNIVERSAL INSURANCE,
COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, et al.,
Magistrate Judge Paul
k issued Findings and
on November 22, 2016, in which he
recommends this Court grant Defendant Washington County Sheriff's
(WCSO) Motion (#201) to Dismiss, grant Defendant
Ryan Corbridge's Motion (#203) to
smiss, grant Defendant
Progressive Universal Insurance Company of Illinois 1 s Motion
smiss, and dismiss this matter with prejudice.
Plaintiff filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendation.
The matter is now be
1 - ORDER
re this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate
Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make
a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's
28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1).
F.3d 930, 932
See also Dawson v. Marshall,
(9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna Tapia,
F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en bane).
This Court has carefully considered Plaintiff's Objections
and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings
so has reviewed the pertinent
portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the
Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS WSCO's
Motion (#201) to Dismiss, GRANTS Ryan Corbridge's Motion (#203)
to Dismiss, GRANTS Progressive's Motion (#211) to
DISMISSES this matter with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
day of February, 2017.
ANNA J. BROWN
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?