Hedin v. Castillo et al

Filing 52

ORDER: Plaintiff's "Supplemental Claim" 51 is construed as a motion to file a supplemental claim, and is allowed. Defendants' Motion for Summary judgment is denied without prejudice to re-file the motion as to plaintiff's complaint as supplemented by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act claim set forth in plaintiff's Motion 51 . Signed on 5/28/15 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (Mailed copy to plaintiff) (dsg)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF OREGON
TERRY PAUL HEDIN,
Plaintiff,

v.

3:14-cv-01504-CL
ORDER

JUAN D. CASTILLO, et al.,
Defendants.
CLARKE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff's "Supplemental Claimu

(#51) is construed as a

motion to file a supplemental claim, and is allowed.
Defendants' Motion for Summary judgment is denied without
prejudice tore-file the motion as to plaintiff's complaint as
supplemented

Act claim

set forth in

Magistrate Judge

1 - ORDER