Hedin v. Castillo et al

Filing 67

ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 63 . Signed on 11/23/2016 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (br4)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
TERRY PAUL HEDIN,
Plaintiff,

3:14-CV-01504-CL
ORDER

v.
JUAN D. CASTILLO,
Regional Director;
MARION FEATHER,
Warden FCI Sheridan;
RICHARD KOWALCZYK,
Head Chaplain FCI Sheridan;
and DANIEL WILLIAMS,
Chaplain FCI Sheridan,
Defendants.

BROWN, Judge.
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke issued Findings and
Recommendation (#63) on September 27, 2016, in which he
recommends the Court grant Defendants' Motion (#56) for Summary
Judgment and dismiss this matter with prejudice.

Plaintiff filed

timely Objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

The matter

is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
1 - ORDER

When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate
Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make
a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's
report.

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561

F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328
F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc).
This Court has carefully considered Plaintiff’s Objections
and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings
and Recommendation.

The Court also has reviewed the pertinent

portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the
Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and
Recommendation (#63).

The Court, therefore, GRANTS Defendants’

Motion (#56) for Summary Judgment and DISMISSES this matter with
prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 23rd day of November, 2016.

s/ Anna J. Brown
ANNA J. BROWN
United States District Judge

2 - ORDER