Andriesian v. Cosmetic Dermatology, Inc.

Filing 30

ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewarts Findings & Recommendation 25 . Therefore, Defendants Motion to Dismiss 15 is granted as to the alleged violations of ORS 646.608(1)(f), (t) and (u) in the First Claim; granted as to the Second Claim; and otherwise denied. See 2-page order attached. Signed on 4/28/2015 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON HILARY ANDRIESIAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, No. 3:14-cv-01600-ST v. COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY, INC., a Florida corporation, ORDER Defendant. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Stewart issued a Findings and Recommendation [25] on March 3, 2015, in which she recommends that this Court grant in part and deny in part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [15]. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Defendant filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the 1 – ORDER Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). I have carefully considered Defendant’s objections and conclude there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and find no other errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart’s Findings & Recommendation [25]. Therefore, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [15] is granted as to the alleged violations of ORS 646.608(1)(f), (t) and (u) in the First Claim; granted as to the Second Claim; and otherwise denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this day of , 2015. MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge 2 – ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?