Jenkins-Brown v. Liberty Acquisitions Servicing, LLC et al

Filing 25

ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings & Recommendation 23 . Accordingly, Defendants' motion to compel arbitration 13 is denied. See 2-page order attached. Signed on 4/16/2015 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ANDREA JENKINS-BROWN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, No. 03:14-cv-01610-ST Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY ACQUISITIONS SERVICING, LLC, and THOMAS L. POTTER, IV, an individual, ORDER Defendants. HERNANDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Stewart issued a Findings and Recommendation (#23) on March 5, 2015, in which she recommends that this Court deny Defendants' motion to compel arbitration. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 1 - ORDER 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings & Recommendation [23]. Accordingly, Defendants' motion to compel arbitration [13] is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this day of , 2015. MARCO A. HERNANDEZ United States District Judge 2 - ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?