Shanafelt v. Hollander et al
Filing
53
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings & Recommendation 49 . Accordingly, Defendants' motions to dismiss [23, 27] are granted. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel 3 is denied as moot. This case is dismissed with prejudice. See 2-page order attached. Signed on 4/16/2015 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
GREGORY A SHANAFELT,
No. 03:14-cv-01722-ST
Plaintiff,
v.
DAVID HOLLANDER, JEFF GERNER, of
SAIF CORP., THOMAS SHERIDAN of
EMPIRE PACIFIC RISK MANAGEMENT,
INC.,
ORDER
Defendant.
HERNANDEZ, District Judge,
Magistrate Judge Stewart issued a Findings and Recommendation (#49) on March 6,
2015, in which she recommends that this Court grant Defendants' motions to dismiss and dismiss
this case with prejudice.
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were
timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,
840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate
1 - ORDER
Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de
novo, I find no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings & Recommendation [49].
Accordingly, Defendants' motions to dismiss [23, 27] are granted. Plaintiff's motion for
appointment of counsel [3] is denied as moot. This case is dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this
day of
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
, 2015.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?