Chambers v. Washington County et al

Filing 29

ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings & Recommendation 23 , and therefore, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 4 is granted. See 2-page order attached. Signed on 4/16/2015 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

WILLIAM CHAMBERS,
Plaintiff,

No. 3:14-cv-01876-PK

v.
WASHINGTON COUNTY,
PAT GARRETT, and
JOSH McCARTHY,

ORDER

Defendants.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation [23] on February 9,
2015, in which he recommends that this Court grant Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [4]
Plaintiff’s claims against them. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation.
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation,
the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's
1 – ORDER

report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United
States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
I have carefully considered Plaintiff’s objections and conclude there is no basis to modify
the Findings & Recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de
novo and find no other errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak’s Findings & Recommendation [23], and
therefore, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [4] is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this

day of

, 2015.

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ
United States District Judge

2 – ORDER