Laurie v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Filing
67
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge You's Findings and Recommendation 60 , and therefore GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion 34 for Summary Judgment and DENIES Defendant's Cross-Motion 36 for Summary Judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 3/13/2017 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (pvh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
LYNN C. LAURIE,
3:14-CV-01937-YY
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant.
BROWN, Judge.
Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You issued Findings and
Recommendation (#60) on January 23, 2017, in which she recommends
the Court grant Plaintiff’s Motion (#34) for Summary Judgment and
deny Defendant’s Cross-Motion (#36) for Summary Judgment.
Defendant filed timely Objections to the Findings and
Recommendation.
The matter is now before this Court pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
1 - ORDER
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate
Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make
a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's
report.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561
F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328
F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc).
This Court has carefully considered Defendant’s Objections
and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings
and Recommendation.
The Court also has reviewed the pertinent
portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the
Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge You’s Findings and
Recommendation (#60) and, therefore, GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion
(#34) for Summary Judgment and DENIES Defendant’s Cross-Motion
(#36) for Summary Judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 13th day of March, 2017.
/s/ Anna J. Brown
ANNA J. BROWN
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?