Horace Mann Insurance Company v. Ngo et al

Filing 66

ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papaks Findings and Recommendation 63 . Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion 59 for Summary Judgment and DECLARES Plaintiff has no obligation to issue benefits to Tran, Seo, and Kang under the terms of Plaintiffs insurance contract, if any, with Ngo. Signed on 05/02/2016 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See attached 2 page Order. (bb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

HORACE MANN INSURANCE COMPANY,
an Illinois corporation,

3:15-cv-00164-PK
ORDER

Plaintiff,
v.
TRIET TRAN, ROY SEO, and
YUNJU KANG,
Defendants.
BROWN, Judge.
Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and
Recommendation (#63) on March 30, 2016, in which he recommends
this Court grant Plaintiff’s Motion (#59) for Summary Judgment
and declare Plaintiff has no obligation to issue benefits to
Defendants Triet Tran, Roy Seo, and Yunju Kang under the terms of
Plaintiff’s insurance contract, if any, with Yen Thi Ngo.
matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
1

- ORDER

The

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and
Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its
obligation to review the record de novo.
561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009).

See Dawson v. Marshall,

See also United States v.

Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc).
Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not
find any error.

CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak’s Findings and
Recommendation (#63).

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s

Motion (#59) for Summary Judgment and DECLARES Plaintiff has no
obligation to issue benefits to Tran, Seo, and Kang under the
terms of Plaintiff’s insurance contract, if any, with Ngo.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 2nd day of May, 2016.
/s/ Anna J. Brown
ANNA J. BROWN
United States District Judge

2

- ORDER