Pierce v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 34

ORDER - The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acostas Findings andRecommendation 32 . Accordingly, the Court REVERSES the Commissioners decision and REMANDS this matter pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Findings and Recommendation. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 26th day of September, 2016, by United States District Judge Anna J. Brown. (peg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MARY PIERCE, 3:15-cv-00325-AC Plaintiff, ORDER v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. BROWN, Judge. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and Recommendation (#32) on September 6, 2016, in which he recommends this Court reverse the decision of the Commissioner and remand this matter for further proceedings. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. 1 - ORDER See Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). See also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta’s Findings and Recommendation (#32). Accordingly, the Court REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision and REMANDS this matter pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Findings and Recommendation. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 26th day of September, 2016. /s/ Anna J. Brown ANNA J. BROWN United States District Judge 2 - ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?