Pierce v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Filing
34
ORDER - The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acostas Findings andRecommendation 32 . Accordingly, the Court REVERSES the Commissioners decision and REMANDS this matter pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Findings and Recommendation. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 26th day of September, 2016, by United States District Judge Anna J. Brown. (peg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
MARY PIERCE,
3:15-cv-00325-AC
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner,
Social Security Administration,
Defendant.
BROWN, Judge.
Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and
Recommendation (#32) on September 6, 2016, in which he recommends
this Court reverse the decision of the Commissioner and remand
this matter for further proceedings.
The matter is now before
this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and
Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its
obligation to review the record de novo.
1 - ORDER
See Dawson v. Marshall,
561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009).
See also United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc).
Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not
find any error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta’s Findings and
Recommendation (#32).
Accordingly, the Court REVERSES the
Commissioner’s decision and REMANDS this matter pursuant to
sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative
proceedings consistent with the Findings and Recommendation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 26th day of September, 2016.
/s/ Anna J. Brown
ANNA J. BROWN
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?