Reddick v. Global Contact Solutions, LLC
Filing
32
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings & Recommendation 30 . Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to remand this action to state court 7 is granted. Signed on 8/26/2015 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
ROSS REDDICK,
Plaintiff,
No. 03:15-cv-00425-PK
v.
GLOBAL CONTACT SOLUTIONS, LLC,
ORDER
Defendant.
HERNANDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation (#30) on July 30, 3015
in which he recommends that this Court grant Plaintiff's motion to remand this action to state
court. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were
timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,
840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate
Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de
1 - ORDER
novo, I find no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings & Recommendation [30].
Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to remand this action to state court [7] is granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this
day of
, 2015.
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?