Van Dyke v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 31

ORDER: Adopting Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation 27 in full. Signed on 9/28/2016 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON RACHEL R. VAN DYKE, Plaintiff, v. Civ. No. 3:15-cv-0690-TC ORDER COMMISSIONER, Social Security Administration, Defendant. _____________________________ MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 27), and the matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. 1 –ORDER Defendant objected to the Findings and Recommendation and sought a remand for further administrative proceedings to determine the onset date. Their objection asserts that the underlying Social Security Administrative “record was not fully developed” and there are “outstanding issues to be resolved,” (Def.’s Br., ECF No. 29) this despite two prior hearings and a detailed record comprising over 1630 pages with medical records beginning as far back as November 7, 2003 to include, for an example, a Comprehensive Mental Health Assessment, dated 8/18/2004. Tr. 852-854. Any remand for further proceeding would serve no useful purpose as the record is fully developed. Magistrate Judge Coffin’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 27) is adopted in full. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 28th day of September, 2016. _______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge 2 –ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?