Control Solutions, Inc. v. MicroDAQ.com, Inc. et al
Filing
29
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings & Recommendation 27 , and therefore, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 17 Plaintiff's complaint is granted. See 2-page order attached. Signed on 8/26/2015 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
CONTROL SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
No. 3:15-cv-00748-PK
v.
MICRODAQ.COM, INC., and
DOES 1-10,
ORDER
Defendants.
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation [27] on July 30, 2015, in
which he recommends that this Court grant Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [17] Plaintiff’s
complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were
timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,
840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate
1 – ORDER
Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de
novo, I find no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak’s Findings & Recommendation [27], and
therefore, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [17] Plaintiff’s complaint is granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this ___________________ day of _________________________, 2015.
________________________________________________
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge
2 – ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?