T-Mobile West LLC v. Johnson Broderick Engineering LLC et al

Filing 69

OPINION & ORDER: Adopting the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation 64 . Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 53 is Granted and all claims against Defendants are Dismissed. Signed on 3/21/18 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (gm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION No. 3:15-CV-00798-PK T-MOBILE WEST LLC, Plaintiff, v. OPINION AND ORDER JOHNSON BRODERICK ENGINEERING LLC and TIM WOLDEN, Defendants. MOSMAN,J., On December 14, 2017, Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued his Findings and Recommendation (F&R) [64], recommending that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [53] should be GRANTED. Plaintiff objected [66]. Defendants responded [68]. DISCUSSION The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). However, the court is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 1 - OPINION AND ORDER the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). Upon review, I agree with Judge Papak's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R [64] as my own opinion. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [53] is GRANTED and all claims against Defendants are DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this"t-( day of March, 2018. 2 - OPINION AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?