Moore v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 24

ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 22 .Accordingly, the Commissioner's decision is reversed, the Commissioner's motion to remand foradditional proceedings 20 is denied, and this action is remanded to the Commissioner for an award of benefits. Signed on 2/7/2017 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (sss)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON JASMINE MOORE, No. 3:15-cv-00918-JE Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ORDER Defendant. HERNANDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Jelderks issued a Findings and Recommendation (#22) on January 10, 2017, in which he recommends that this Court reverse the Commissioner's decision to deny Supplemental Security Income, deny the Commissioner's motion to remand for additional proceedings, and remand the action for an award of benefits. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 1 - ORDER 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings & Recommendation [22]. Accordingly, the Commissioner's decision is reversed, the Commissioner's motion to remand for additional proceedings [20] is denied, and this action is remanded to the Commissioner for an award of benefits. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this day of MARCO A. HERNANDEZ United States District Judge 2 - ORDER , 2017.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?