LNV Corporation v. Fauley et al
OPINION & ORDER: Defendant's Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order 92 is DENIED without prejudice. Signed on 12/5/2017 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
LNV CORPORATION, a Nevada
OPINION & ORDER
ROBYNNE A. FAULEY, a citizen of the
State of Oregon; and U.S. BANK
1 – OPINION & ORDER
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Before the Court is Defendant Robynne Fauley’s Rule 60 Motion for Relief from
Judgment or Order . The Court DENIES the Motion. Defendant’s case is currently on appeal
before the Ninth Circuit, divesting the Court of its jurisdiction. Laurino v. Syringa Gen. Hosp.,
279 F.3d 750, 755 (9th Cir. 2002) (citing Griggs v. Provident Consumer Disc. Co., 459 U.S. 56,
58–59 (1982)); Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1(a)(2). In addition, Defendant’s motion was not filed within
one-year after the entry of judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(c)(1). The Court also DENIES
Plaintiff’s request to enter a pre-filing order against Defendant.
Defendant’s Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order  is DENIED without
IT IS SO ORDERED
day of ______________________, 2017.
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge
2 – OPINION & ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?