Kimble v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Filing
32
ORDER: Granting Application for Fees Pursuant to EAJA 30 . Following my review of Plaintiff's Motion and supporting documentation, and after consideration of Defendant's stipulation, and pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, $12,637.31 is awarded to Plaintiff in care of her attorney. See Order for further details. Signed on 10/11/2017 by Magistrate Judge John Jelderks. (jtj)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF OREGON
JESSICA LINN KIMBLE
Civil No. 3:15-cv-01641-JE
Plaintiff,
vs.,
ORDER TO PAY
EAJA FEES
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
COMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
Defendant.
Jelderks, Magistrate Judge:
Following my review of Plaintiff’s Motion and supporting documentation, and after
consideration of Defendant’s stipulation, and pursuant to the Equal Access to
Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, $ 12,637.31 is awarded to Plaintiff in care of her attorney,
Nancy J. Meserow, and the check for EAJA fees shall be made payable to Nancy J.
Meserow, based upon Plaintiff’s assignment of these amounts to Plaintiff’s attorney Nancy
J. Meserow, subject to the satisfaction of Plaintiff's debts, if any, under Astrue v. Ratliff,
130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010); and in addition, Plaintiff is awarded $10.00 for postage expenses,
and $5.00 in photocopying costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1920. Any check issued for EAJA
fees or for costs and expenses shall be sent to Plaintiff in care of his attorney, Nancy J.
Meserow, at her office, located at the following address:
Law Office of Nancy J. Meserow
7540 SW 51st Ave.
Portland, OR
97219.
ORDER to pay EAJA fees– 3:15-cv-01641-JE
Page 1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11th
October
Dated this __________________ day of ______________________, 2017
/s/ John Jelderks
_____________________________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, John Jelderks
ORDER to pay EAJA fees– 3:15-cv-01641-JE
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?