Cook v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Amended Findings & Recommendation 31 , and therefore, Plaintiff's request for Equal Access to Justice Act attorney's fees is granted in part in the amount of $4,659.25. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 10/24/2017 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (gw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
MARLA J. COOK,
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Stacie Beckerman issued an Amended Findings and Recommendation
 on September 9, 2017, in which she recommends that the Court grant in part Plaintiff’s
Motion for Attorney Fees Under 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) .
Plaintiff has timely filed objections  to the Amended Findings & Recommendation.
The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil
1 – ORDER
When a party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Findings &
Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the
Magistrate Judge’s report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th
Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
The Court has carefully considered Plaintiff’s objections and concludes there is no basis
to modify the Findings & Recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions
of the record de novo and finds no errors in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation.
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman’s Amended Findings &
Recommendation , and therefore, Plaintiff’s request for Equal Access to Justice Act
attorney’s fees is granted in part in the amount of $ 4,659.25.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge
2 – ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?