Westphal v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 21

ORDER - The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings andRecommendation (#19). Accordingly, the Court REVERSES thedecision of the Commissioner and REMANDS this matter pursuant tosentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for the immediate calculationand award of benefits. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 25th day of January, 2017, by United States District Judge Anna J. Brown. (peg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON CANDY WESTPHAL, 3:15-cv-01904-AC Plaintiff, ORDER v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Conunissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. BROWN, Judge. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and Recommendation (#19) on December 27, 2016, in which he recommends this Court reverse and remand the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's application for supplemental security income benefits and disability insurance benefits for the immediate calculation and award of benefits. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). 1 ORDER Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009) Reyna-Tapia, See Dawson v. Marshall, See also United States v. 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en bane). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation (#19). Accordingly, the Court REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner and REMANDS this matter pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for the immediate calculation and award of benefits. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this ;.c;""" day of January, 2017. ANNA~ United States District Judge 2 ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?