Fifield v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 27

ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 23 . See, formal Order. Signed on 3/30/2017 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (rdr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MICHAEL JAMES FIFIELD Plaintiff, Case No. 3: 15 CV 02180-CL v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendants. Magistrate Judge Clarke filed Findings and Recommendation on January 10, 2017. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any po1tion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo dete1mination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l); McDonnell Douglas Coro. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). Plaintiff has timely filed objections and the defendant has timely filed a response. I have, therefore, given de novo review of Magistrate Judge Clarke's rulings. I find no error. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that I adopt Magistrate Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation filed January 10, 2017 in its entirety. Dated this 3'.) day of March, 2017. Ann Aiken, United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?