Fifield v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 27

ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 23 . See, formal Order. Signed on 3/30/2017 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (rdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MICHAEL JAMES FIFIELD
Plaintiff,
Case No. 3: 15 CV 02180-CL

v.
ORDER
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendants.

Magistrate Judge Clarke filed Findings and Recommendation on January 10, 2017.
The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When
either party objects to any po1tion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, the
district court must make a de novo dete1mination of that portion of the magistrate judge's
report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l); McDonnell Douglas Coro. v. Commodore Business
Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).
Plaintiff has timely filed objections and the defendant has timely filed a response. I
have, therefore, given de novo review of Magistrate Judge Clarke's rulings.
I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that I adopt Magistrate Judge Clarke's
Findings and Recommendation filed January 10, 2017 in its entirety.
Dated this

3'.)

day of March, 2017.

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge