Williams v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
ORDER by Judge Anna J. Brown signed on 6/23/17. The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation (# 36 ). Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS the Commissioner's decision and DISMISSES this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jy)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
BRUCE ALLEN WILLIAMS,
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner, Social
Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and
Recommendation (#36) on May 22, 2017, in which he recommends the
Court affirm the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's
application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental
Plaintiff filed timely Objections to the
Findings and Recommendation.
The matter is now before this Court
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate
Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make
a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561
F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328
F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc).
This Court has reviewed the record de novo, including
The Court concludes Plaintiff's
Objections do not provide a basis to modify the Magistrate
Judge's Findings and Recommendation.
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and
Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS the
Commissioner's decision and DISMISSES this matter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 23rd day of June, 2017.
/s/ Anna J. Brown
ANNA J. BROWN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?