Gosha et al v. Bank of New York Mellon Corporation et al

Filing 18

Temporary Restraining Order: The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion 3 for a Temporary Restraining Order and hereby RESTRAINS Defendants from proceeding with the January 26, 2016, foreclosure sale of Plaintiffs property. The Court DIRECTS Pl aintiffs to post a $1,100 bond with the Clerk of Court no later than 4:30 p.m. on February 5, 2016, and on the fifth of every month thereafter aslong as this Temporary Restraining Order is in place. Signed on 01/25/2016 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See attached 4 page Temporary Restraining Order for full text. (bb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON GARY C. GOSHA and KIT M. GOSHA, Plaintiffs, v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION fka THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE (CWALT 2005-72), a New York Corporation; BANK OF AMERICA N.A., a Delaware Corporation; BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC, a Florida Corporation; CLEAR RECON CORP, a California Corporation, Defendants. GARY C. GOSHA KIT M. GOSHA 175900 S.W. Cheyenne Way Tualatin, OR 97062 503-522-6571 Plaintiffs, Pro Se 1 - TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 3:16-CV-00073-BR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER TRACY J. FRAZIER Aldridge Pite, LLP 621 S.W. Morrison Street Suite 425 Portland, OR 97204 (831) 247-0676 Attorneys for Defendant Clear Recon Corp. BROWN, Judge. This matter came before the Court on January 22, 2016, on Plaintiffs’ Motion (#3) for Temporary Restraining Order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 seeking to restrain Defendant Clear Recon Corporation from conducting a foreclosure and sale of Plaintiffs’ home scheduled for January 26, 2016. Defendant Clear Recon Corporation received notice of and appeared at the January 22, 2016, hearing. For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing the Court concludes it is a very close question as to whether Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of this action. The Court, however, finds there is a temporary risk of irrevocable harm to Plaintiffs, who are senior citizens and on a fixed income, if they are required to move from their residence on January 26, 2016. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion and temporarily RESTRAINS Clear Recon Corporation from proceeding with the January 26, 2016, foreclosure sale of Plaintiffs’ property at 17590 S.W. Cheyenne Way, Tualatin, Oregon. 2 - TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Pursuant to Rule 65(c), the Court requires Plaintiffs to post a $1,100 bond with the Clerk of Court no later than 4:30 p.m. on February 5, 2016, and on the fifth of every month thereafter as long as this Temporary Restraining Order is in place as a reasonable security for any costs or damages sustained by any party found to have been wrongfully restrained. Failure to post the bond on or before the fifth of each month as long as this Temporary Restraining Order is in place shall result in the immediate dissolution of this Temporary Restraining Order. The Court DIRECTS Plaintiffs to file no later than February 19, 2016, a Status Report with respect to service of all Defendants in this matter including (1) reference to the docket establishing all Defendants have been served and proofs of service have been filed for each Defendant and (2) whether Plaintiffs have had contact with any Defendant or counsel for any Defendant relating to this matter. CONCLUSION For these reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion (#3) for a Temporary Restraining Order and hereby RESTRAINS Defendants from proceeding with the January 26, 2016, foreclosure sale of Plaintiffs’ property. The Court DIRECTS Plaintiffs to post a $1,100 bond with the Clerk of Court no later than 4:30 p.m. on February 5, 2016, and on the fifth of every month thereafter as 3 - TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER long as this Temporary Restraining Order is in place. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 25th day of January, 2016. /s/ Anna J. Brown ANNA J. BROWN United States District Judge 4 - TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?